Norwegian has big plans for Juneau, But is the city ready?

With its legacy of gold mining and the majestic Mendenhall Glacier just outside of town, Juneau has long been a crown jewel among Alaska cruise itineraries. But as demand has grown, so have congestion and concerns among residents about the quality of life during the all-too-brief summer months.
Now, an effort by Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) to buy a key parcel of land along the downtown waterfront could bring those issues into high relief as citizens debate how much cruise tourism they want.
NCLH’s bid to buy the 2.9-acre site known as the Subport comes as the number of cruise passengers arriving in Juneau has grown from 1 million to 1.5 million in the past four years and as NCLH has embraced an ambitious plan to beef up its shore facilities throughout southeast Alaska. 
But Juneau could test Alaska’s appetite for hosting more and bigger cruise ships with each passing season.
Rorie Watt, manager of the city and borough of Juneau, said, “The growth has been climbing pretty steeply. We’re starting to see quite a bit of pushback from the community.”
Vacant since 2006, the Subport property is controlled by a state trust that provides services to Alaska’s disabled population. Juneau has been urging the trust to sell the land and had a proposal of its own for the site.
When the parcel came up for auction, NCLH was the high bidder. At $20 million, its offer was nearly double the next highest bid, from Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., and more than quadruple the $4.3 million tendered by the city.

Image result for juneau subport property

The sum was all the more impressive because, according to Watt, current zoning would not permit the company to build a pier at the site. 
“It is true the property is not currently zoned for a cruise ship dock, and it is true that our waterfront plan does not call for a dock in that area,” Watt said.
After the bids were opened, NCLH said in a statement that it was “thrilled to be the winning bidder,” adding, “We look forward to engaging with the city of Juneau to work together on a plan for the land that will greatly benefit both Juneau and our company.”
The company declined to comment further about its plans for the site.
The zoning of the Subport land emerged from a debate in the early 2000s among Juneau residents over cruise-related congestion that had resulted from a previous cruise line growth spurt in the 1990s, Watt said.
At that time, a consensus emerged that the Subport was not an appropriate site for a cruise pier, so the zoning was changed and a long-range waterfront land-use document was adopted to reflect that.
In addition, Watt said the city owns the tidal lands in front of the parcel, and NCLH would either have to buy those or work out a lease in order to put its ships there.
Both changes would require more than obtaining a variance from a zoning board. The decision would almost surely be made by elected officials, Watt said. 
“There would likely be a substantial amount of public process if they were to do that,” he said.
Juneau is one of several ports in Alaska where NCLH is seeking to build its own infrastructure. In Hoonah, it is partnering with the Alaska Native tribe that owns the Icy Strait Point cruise port to build a second pier for its use.
In Ketchikan, NCLH has agreed to be the first tenant at a pier being developed north of town at an abandoned paper mill. The site at Ward Cove would give it preferential berthing rights. The site was developed by the local Ward Cove Group and a tour operator, Godspeed of Fairbanks.
The $50 million pier proposal is in the permitting process, and the partners hope to have it open for the 2020 cruise season.
NCLH also joined with the Port of Seattle in 2015 to redevelop the Bell Street Terminal at Pier 66 in downtown Seattle, where its Alaska-bound ships also have secured preferential berthing rights following the $30 million upgrade.
Angie Ryan, a Travel Leaders agent in Frisco, Texas, said the investments would make NCLH cruises more attractive to clients. 
“I think that by using their own facilities and their own dock, it can keep the standard they’re trying to present across the board,” Ryan said. “Like they built their own dock in Roatan, [Honduras], and it’s a much nicer pier than the one Carnival uses,” she said. “And I think that’s a draw.”

Homeport capacity drives upgrades

NCLH isn’t the only cruise company upgrading its Alaska shore product. In 2018, Carnival Corp. spent $290 million in Skagway to acquire a scenic railway and related port facilities, and it formed a joint venture to manage the business.
Since then, the venture has added a berthing dolphin (an above-water marine structure that is not connected to the shore) at the end of the railroad dock complex. The dolphin now enables the berthing of two large ships there, according to Carnival Corp. chief communications officer Roger Frizzell.
The moves are part of a larger expansion of cruise infrastructure in Alaska, driven by increased homeport capacity.

Image result for Vancouver's Canada Place terminal

From Seattle and Vancouver, cruise lines now have the ability to launch six ships simultaneously: three from Vancouver’s Canada Place terminal, two from Pier 91 at Seattle’s Smith Cove and one from the Bell Street terminal.
“I think the way to look at southeast Alaska is that most of the cruise ship visitation is predicated on weeklong cruises that initiate out of Seattle or Vancouver,” Watt said. “And berth capacity has been added in Seattle and Vancouver, so there’s going to be capacity for six ships leaving there.”
That enhanced capacity will have a domino effect on port capacity in Alaska. With the addition of Ward Cove, Ketchikan would have berths for six ships a day, including Norwegian Cruise Line’s two 4,000-passenger ships, the Norwegian Bliss and the Norwegian Joy.
Watt said the question for Juneau, which currently has four berths, is whether it wants to keep pace.
The addition of 500,000 cruise visitors since 2015 has meant a lot of perceived change for residents, Watt said. 
“It’s a lot of economic opportunities, but it’s also that your quiet neighbourhood may be less quiet,” he said.
He added: “On Juneau’s side, I would imagine we’re going to go through a period of high-level community vision-type exercises. What kind of town do we want to be, and where are we headed, and how do we plan appropriately for that? My guess is that Norwegian has jumped into the middle of that conversation, and realistically, we’re probably not going to be moving very fast. I think it will take us a while.”

Norwegian Cruise Line Wins Key Juneau Property Bid

Norwegian Bliss

According to media reports in Alaska, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings was the winning bidder for the “Subport” property in Juneau Alaska, located on Egan Drive on the waterfront.

Norwegian was said to be the highest bidder, offering $20 million over Royal Caribbean’s $13 million. Other bids included Godspeed Inc. at $12,8 million, Survey Point Holdings Inc. at $5.255 million and the City of Juneau at $4.25 million.

“I think it’s fair to say that that’s a fairly shocking bid,” said Juneau City Manager Rorie Watt, via KTOO Media. “I don’t know that I’ve ever seen a property sell for six times the appraised value.”

The piece of property is 2.9 acres and will allow its owner to help expand Juneau’s tourism area and take pressures off the downtown on busy cruise days.

According to KINY Radio, the property is not zoned for a cruise ship dock.

Norwegian has a 15-day window to submit a deposit and complete the purchase agreement.

Of note, Norwegian increased its Alaska capacity some 15 per cent in 2018 with the new Norwegian Bliss, while ticket pricing increased 25 per cent. This summer capacity is up again as the Joy has moved into the market and has been a strong performer.

The cruise industry view of Trump’s order to leave China

Image result for royal caribbean in china

With President Trump “ordering” U.S. companies via Twitter to leave China, and suggesting they return home, one wonders what would happen if he turned his attention to the cruise firms headquartered in Miami.

Could he “order” them to bring their Shanghai-based ships back to U.S. waters? Or to stop building their $1 billion ships in Europe?

Of course, the first obstacle is that none of these companies are legally incorporated in the U.S. But set that aside for a minute. They’re certainly American companies in other respects.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings CEO Frank Del Rio appears to have beaten Trump to the punch by ordering home the Norwegian Joy to sail in Alaska this summer alongside its doppelganger, the Norwegian Bliss.

Of course, Del Rio acted for business reasons and not out of any animosity towards China or need to chastise Chinese leader Xi Jinping for raising tariffs.

If Royal Caribbean International or Princess Cruises did pull their ships from China, they would probably be rewarded on Wall Street, which has a much easier time analyzing profits in the short term than investments for the long haul, which the China market needs.

But the cruise ship example shows how perverse the strategy of “finding an alternative to China” can be for many industries. Calling home the ships in the China market doesn’t mean they would sail from Seattle to San Diego full of happy Americans.

In fact, American law would prohibit them from being used that way. The ships would go back into the international mix of itineraries that have some ships departing from Miami and New York, but others from Barcelona and Southampton.

The kingly notion of imposing tariffs and directing private business decisions from the throne was losing viability when economist Adam Smith attacked it in the 18th century. It may have some political appeal but in economic terms, the world has passed it by.

For the same reason, building big cruise ships in America – no matter the cost – makes no particular sense either.

As many companies manufacturing in China are finding out, the key in the 21st century to making things reliably and at market prices is an intelligent and at least somewhat skilled workforce and a robust network of proven contractors that can accommodate just in time delivery.

That’s what the European shipyards that make cruise ships have. And by operating within the framework of the European Union they can bring to bear a workforce that while not as large as China’s is larger than the U.S’s.

Yes, China may be cheating on some of the economic terms and conditions that make free trade a win-win proposition. But going back to the idea that each country should manufacture everything on its own makes about as much sense as booking your next cruise on the Nina, the Pinta or the Santa Maria.