Couple’s removal from Celebrity cruise raises dementia issue

By Tom Stieghorst

The plight of an older couple that was put off a Celebrity Cruises ship in Australia mid-cruise illustrates some of the tricky issues facing cruise lines when passengers are afflicted with dementia.

The couple, John and Adry Arnold, had booked a nine-day cruise on the Celebrity Millennium in November to celebrate their 55th wedding anniversary.

Celebrity said it decided to debark Adry Arnold when a housekeeper found her alone and disoriented in her cabin. Her husband was on a shore excursion and could not be reached.

When he returned to the ship, Celebrity had their bags packed and had arranged for an ambulance to take them to a hospital in Cairns. The Arnolds, who live in a town a few hours west of Sydney, will get a pro-rated refund.

In an interview with a TV station in Perth, John Arnold said his wife, 78, has dementia but can still perform familiar activities. “A lot of things she can do by rote, having done it many times,” he told the “Today Tonight” program on Channel 7 in Perth.

Arnold said his wife had been up and down the same staircase on the ship but apparently got confused returning to her cabin. Arnold had been leaving her on the ship at ports for an hour at a time to go ashore.

He told the program he was “gobsmacked” by the decision to remove him, which he said was not explained. “They didn’t tell me a thing,” he said, “except the so-called doctor considered that she was a liability and had to be taken off the ship.”

Arnold was critical of how abruptly he was removed from the ship and said the hospital didn’t know what to do with them when they arrived.

“I’ll always remember the wedding anniversary from being dumped from an American ship in Cairns,” he said.

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., parent of Celebrity Cruises, said in a statement that it acted out of concern for Adry Arnold’s safety.

“Every year, thousands of guests with medical conditions sail onboard Celebrity Cruises ships,” the statement said. “However, for their own safety and the safety of others, these guests must be able to care for themselves.”

Curtis Mase, a Miami attorney who often defends cruise lines in lawsuits, said the liability issues are very real.

“Imagine what happens in this situation where a cruise line allows someone who is physically or mentally not able to take care of themselves to travel without someone, they then cause some kind of safety concern,” he said. “Take your pick: They accidentally lower a lifeboat and injure someone as a result, or they trigger some alarm or go into someplace they shouldn’t have gone.

“All of a sudden the cruise line is liable because they didn’t have a reasonable policy for how someone like that could travel,” Mase said.

He said with advanced notice, the cruise line probably could have arranged an accommodation that would have averted the debarkation.

Cynthia Martinez, a spokeswoman for RCCL, said travel agents with clients who may be mentally diminished should have a conversation about it before booking a cruise.

Mary Beth Lantzy, a spokeswoman for the Alzheimer’s Association, said when considering a trip for someone with dementia, agents should try to visit places that were familiar before the onset of dementia and that involve as few changes in daily routine as possible.

Cruise lines digest plans to limit Venice visits

Cruise lines digest plans to limit Venice visits

By Phil Davies

Cruise lines digest plans to limit Venice visitsGlobal cruise lines are digesting the implications of plans to limited the number of large ships allowed to pass through the centre of Venice.

The Italian government announced its intention to impose limitations from January with a 20% cut, while cruise ships of more than 96,000 tonnes will be banned from the centre of the historic city from November 2014.

Prime Minister Enrico Letta’s office also announced plans to open up a new canal to the city to allow big vessels to enter the city by an alternative route.

The Cruise Lines International Association (Clia) yesterday attempted to view the decision in a positive light despite the likely impact on member lines which see Venice as a highlight of many Mediterranean itineraries.

Clia said it viewed the announcement from Rome as a “positive on-going commitment of the representatives of the Italian institutions to find a sustainable and long-term solution for the city of Venice. This goal is shared by the cruise industry”.

However, the organisation added: “We are in the process of determining the impact of the decision, and any estimation or evaluation at this time is premature.

“Venice is consistently rated as the number one European cruise destination for our industry and we look forward to further strengthening our role as a key contributor to the economic vitality of Venice.”

Environmentalists have long protested against giant cruise ships passing through Venice, arguing that they damage the city’s fragile lagoon.

Celebrity Xpedition banned from Galapagos National Park

Celebrity Xpedition banned from Galapagos National Park

Celebrity Cruises is in trouble with local authorities from the Galapagos Islands for transporting frozen lobster tails out of season.

As a result, the Celebrity Xpedition has had its licence revoked for entering Galapagos National Park, something that has resulted in the cancellation of a June 2nd cruise to the destination.

While the suspension is temporary, reports suggest that Celebrity does not yet know if its June 9th sailing will be allowed to go ahead.

Affected passengers have been provided with a full refund, as well as a 50 per cent discount for future Xpedition cruises and reimbursements for airline change fees.

It is thought that 12kg of frozen lobster tails are at the centre of the dispute. Celebrity says that the seafood was purchased legally during season from Park-certified fishermen.

Although the cruise line says that National Park officials confirmed this, the regulations suggest that all such produce must be consumed within five days of the end of season.

Celebrity says that it was not aware of this recent change to regulations, which it says was not publicised until after the company had already been cited. As well as the suspension, Celebrity was fined $2,000 (£1,311).

Nisha at Sea